The thing that gets to me is that, yes, TV!Harry has differences, but it's a lot easier to meld TV!Harry and Book!Harry than it is to meld, say, TV!Bob and Book!Bob. Or even the two Murphys (The Two Murphys from Chicago? Hee).
I don't get to watch the TV episodes as often because (A) I lent out my beloved DVDs, and (B) sometimes the eps on my computer cause my computer to turn off on its own and reboot. So, I end up listening to the books in the car whenever I'm driving, which is really a lovely thing.
Still! My point is that book!Harry and TV!Harry don't have to sound all that different, impo. They both have the same hard-boiled noir feel to the way they "speak" when telling the story, and Harry's an emotional guy. *pets the woobie gently*
Thank you for taking the time to read and leave a comment. Feedback is love, and when someone mentions what they like, that helps me out even more. Thank you.
OMG, someone did a happy dance when they saw this?
no subject
I don't get to watch the TV episodes as often because (A) I lent out my beloved DVDs, and (B) sometimes the eps on my computer cause my computer to turn off on its own and reboot. So, I end up listening to the books in the car whenever I'm driving, which is really a lovely thing.
Still! My point is that book!Harry and TV!Harry don't have to sound all that different, impo. They both have the same hard-boiled noir feel to the way they "speak" when telling the story, and Harry's an emotional guy. *pets the woobie gently*
Thank you for taking the time to read and leave a comment. Feedback is love, and when someone mentions what they like, that helps me out even more. Thank you.
OMG, someone did a happy dance when they saw this?
*blush!*
And compared my Harry to Jim's? omg!
*blushes more*
AND YAY LIONS IN KENYA.